Struggling to stand out in Amazon’s rigorous interview process? The STAR method is a popular framework, but many candidates fail to use it effectively, costing them the opportunity to impress. In this article, we reveal the top 5 reasons the STAR method doesn’t work for Amazon interviews and how to fix them. Learn to align your answers with Amazon’s Leadership Principles, avoid common pitfalls, and demonstrate the depth and impact interviewers expect.
Ready to ace your interview? Kalena Advisors provides tailored coaching to help you craft compelling STAR responses, tackle follow-up questions, and showcase your unique value. Let us help you land your dream role!
1. Lack of Depth in Problem Solving
- Why It’s a Problem:
STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) often leads candidates to focus on storytelling without diving into the technical or strategic depth of their problem-solving approach. - Impact:
Candidates may fail to demonstrate analytical thinking or innovative problem-solving, which are highly valued at Amazon. - Tip:
Supplement STAR with an explanation of your thought process, decision-making criteria, and lessons learned.
2. Overemphasis on the Result
- Why It’s a Problem:
STAR prioritizes the result as the conclusion of the story, which can overshadow the importance of the candidate’s actions and thought process. - Impact:
Interviewers at Amazon are more interested in how you achieved the result, aligned with Leadership Principles like Ownership and Dive Deep. - Tip:
Spend more time discussing the “Action” step, highlighting specific contributions, challenges, and how you addressed them.
3. Inability to Showcase Leadership Principles
- Why It’s a Problem:
The STAR method, when applied rigidly, doesn’t naturally map to Amazon’s 16 Leadership Principles, which are critical for success in interviews. - Impact:
Candidates may miss opportunities to align their stories with principles like Customer Obsession or Earn Trust. - Tip:
Start by identifying the Leadership Principle(s) your example reflects and explicitly weave them into your STAR response.
4. Over-Simplification of Complex Scenarios
- Why It’s a Problem:
STAR can encourage candidates to oversimplify or omit key details to fit the structure, making answers sound generic or incomplete. - Impact:
This can lead to a lack of nuance in responses, which Amazon interviewers may interpret as shallow or insufficient preparation. - Tip:
Focus on showcasing the complexity of the task and how you navigated it, even if it means a slightly longer response.
5. Insufficient Flexibility for Follow-Up Questions
- Why It’s a Problem:
STAR answers can feel rehearsed, leaving candidates unprepared for follow-up questions that require them to “Dive Deep” into their actions or decisions. - Impact:
Candidates risk coming across as overly polished but lacking depth, which undermines their credibility. - Tip:
Practice expanding on each part of your STAR story to be ready for detailed questions about your decisions, trade-offs, and results.
Want to do better? Learn about Kalena Advisor’s answer to STAR, “Landing the Plane”. Book your free consultation now >